It’s not another lateral thinking puzzle, it is a real question with a truthful answer.
They were all born on the 12th of February – exactly 200 years ago in the case of two of them. The one that wasn’t born quite so long ago has been ruminating on Darwin’s legacy…
I think I’ve found the fundamental flaw at the heart of evolutionism. It’s not rocket science. Well, obviously.
No, I mean, it doesn’t take a genius to work out where Darwin got it so completely and utterly wrong.
In the introduction to On the Origin of Species he maintains that “any being, if it vary however slightly in any manner profitable to itself, under the complex and sometimes varying conditions of life, will have a better chance of surviving, and thus be naturally selected”.
If this is true, then surely the reverse is also true – and anyone born with the incredibly debilitating stupid gene, which so adversely affects creationists, would naturally be at a huge disadvantage.
So if Darwin’s theory were correct, then over the course of time the stupid gene would be bred out and those that believe in the literal truth of the Bible would not survive.
But they do, and worse, they seem to be flourishing.
Clearly Darwin was barking up the wrong evolutionary tree.
Footnote from Beta Mum -
Or, the stupid gene, far from being a disadvantage, actually helps those affected by it live their allotted span in a contented bovine state, oblivious to the brutal world around them – and thus they thrive.